2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2006 Ford E-350
To start off, 2006 Ford E-350 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (190 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford E-350 weights approximately 673 kg more than 2005 Chrysler 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (258 Nm). This means 2006 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2006 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 300 | E-350 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 5408 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 255 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 475 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 8.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 2488 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 132 L |