2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2006 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2006 Ford Ranger is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 4,016 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2006 Ford Ranger. (206 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (332 Nm) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Ford Ranger. (324 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Ford Ranger.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2006 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 300 | Ranger |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 4016 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 206 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 324 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 100.4 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 84.4 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 84 L |