2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2006 Renault Logan
To start off, 2006 Renault Logan is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 2006 Renault Logan. (74 HP @ 5 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2006 Renault Logan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 498 kg more than 2006 Renault Logan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (332 Nm) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Renault Logan. (112 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Renault Logan.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2006 Renault Logan | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | 300 | Logan |
Year Released | 2005 | 2006 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 112 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 79.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 70 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1554 kg | 1056 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4250 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 50 L |