2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2008 MG ZR
To start off, 2008 MG ZR is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,653 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (340 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 238 more horse power than 2008 MG ZR. (102 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2008 MG ZR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 740 kg more than 2008 MG ZR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (529 Nm) has 406 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 MG ZR. (123 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 MG ZR.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2008 MG ZR | |
Make | Chrysler | MG |
Model | 300 | ZR |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5653 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 123 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 1095 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 50 L |