2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2008 MG ZT-T
To start off, 2008 MG ZT-T is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 2008 MG ZT-T is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2008 MG ZT-T (256 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2008 MG ZT-T should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 MG ZT-T weights approximately 261 kg more than 2005 Chrysler 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2008 MG ZT-T (411 Nm) has 79 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (332 Nm). This means 2008 MG ZT-T will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2008 MG ZT-T | |
Make | Chrysler | MG |
Model | 300 | ZT-T |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 256 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 411 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 90.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1554 kg | 1815 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 65 L |