2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2008 Rover 25
To start off, 2008 Rover 25 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 3,518 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 153 more horse power than 2008 Rover 25. (100 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2008 Rover 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 424 kg more than 2008 Rover 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (332 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Rover 25. (240 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Rover 25.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2008 Rover 25 | |
Make | Chrysler | Rover |
Model | 300 | 25 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 1992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 240 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 84.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 88.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 19.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1554 kg | 1130 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 5.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 50 L |