2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2009 Dodge Ram
To start off, 2009 Dodge Ram is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Ram (345 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 18 kg more than 2009 Dodge Ram.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Ram (510 Nm) has 170 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (340 Nm). This means 2009 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2009 Dodge Ram | |
Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
Model | 300 | Ram |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3516 cc | 5654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 345 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 510 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 6 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1709 kg | 1691 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 6350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 2000 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3190 mm | 4080 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 132 L |