2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2009 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2009 Fiat Bravo is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 3,516 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 102 more horse power than 2009 Fiat Bravo. (148 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2009 Fiat Bravo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 359 kg more than 2009 Fiat Bravo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (340 Nm) has 134 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Fiat Bravo. (206 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2009 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Chrysler | Fiat |
Model | 300 | Bravo |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3516 cc | 1367 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 206 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1709 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3190 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 58 L |