2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2009 Ford F-250
To start off, 2009 Ford F-250 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford F-250 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 743 kg more than 2009 Ford F-250.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford F-250 (495 Nm) has 155 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (340 Nm). This means 2009 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2009 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 300 | F-250 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3516 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 495 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 10.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1709 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 7.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 144 L |