2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2009 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2009 GMC Sierra is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (335 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 2009 GMC Sierra. (192 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2009 GMC Sierra.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (529 Nm) has 269 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 GMC Sierra. (260 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 GMC Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2009 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Chrysler | GMC |
Model | 300 | Sierra |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 4300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 192 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 260 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.2:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3030 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.8 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 15.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 98 L |