2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2009 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 3,498 cc, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C (268 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 78 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (190 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 489 kg more than 2009 Mercedes-Benz C.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Mercedes-Benz C (350 Nm) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (258 Nm). This means 2009 Mercedes-Benz C will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2009 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Chrysler | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 300 | C |
Year Released | 2005 | 2009 |
Body Type | Sedan | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 3498 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 268 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 350 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.7:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 1326 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 9.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 66 L |