2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2010 BMW X5
To start off, 2010 BMW X5 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,653 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (340 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 80 more horse power than 2010 BMW X5. (260 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2010 BMW X5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW X5 weights approximately 425 kg more than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (529 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 BMW X5. (305 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2010 BMW X5 | |
Make | Chrysler | BMW |
Model | 300 | X5 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5653 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6600 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 305 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 2260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4854 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1933 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1765 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2934 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 85 L |