2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2010 BMW X5
To start off, 2010 BMW X5 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,653 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW X5 (350 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (340 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW X5 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW X5 weights approximately 585 kg more than 2005 Chrysler 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (529 Nm) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 BMW X5. (474 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 BMW X5.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2010 BMW X5 | |
Make | Chrysler | BMW |
Model | 300 | X5 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5653 cc | 4800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 350 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 474 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 2420 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4854 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1933 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1765 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2934 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 85 L |