2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2010 Dodge Challenger
To start off, 2010 Dodge Challenger is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 6,100 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Dodge Challenger (425 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 320 kg more than 2005 Chrysler 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Dodge Challenger (569 Nm) has 237 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (332 Nm). This means 2010 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chrysler 300 | 2010 Dodge Challenger | |
| Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
| Model | 300 | Challenger |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3518 cc | 6100 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 253 HP | 425 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6200 RPM |
| Torque | 332 Nm | 569 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1554 kg | 1874 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5022 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1923 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2946 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 9.8 L/100km | 10.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 72 L |
