2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2010 Ford F-250
To start off, 2010 Ford F-250 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Ford F-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford F-250 (300 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford F-250 should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Ford F-250 weights approximately 1251 kg more than 2005 Chrysler 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford F-250 (494 Nm) has 162 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (332 Nm). This means 2010 Ford F-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2010 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 300 | F-250 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 300 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 494 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1554 kg | 2805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 6253 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1961 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3967 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 115 L |