2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2010 Ford Maverick
To start off, 2010 Ford Maverick is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,653 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (340 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 192 more horse power than 2010 Ford Maverick. (148 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2010 Ford Maverick. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 317 kg more than 2010 Ford Maverick. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (529 Nm) has 329 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Ford Maverick. (200 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Ford Maverick.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2010 Ford Maverick | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 300 | Maverick |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5653 cc | 2288 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 148 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 200 Nm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 1518 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 9.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 62 L |