2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 2,776 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (190 HP) has 42 more horse power than 2010 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2010 Holden Epica.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (258 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | 300 | Epica |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 258 Nm | 320 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |