2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2010 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,652 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Commander (322 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 69 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Jeep Commander weights approximately 801 kg more than 2005 Chrysler 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Jeep Commander (500 Nm) has 168 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (332 Nm). This means 2010 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2010 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Chrysler | Jeep |
Model | 300 | Commander |
Year Released | 2005 | 2010 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 5652 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 322 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 500 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 99.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 90.9 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.9:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1554 kg | 2355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 15.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 78 L |