2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2012 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2012 Ford Mustang is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Ford Mustang (412 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 222 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (190 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 128 kg more than 2012 Ford Mustang.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Ford Mustang (528 Nm) has 270 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (258 Nm). This means 2012 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2012 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | 300 | Mustang |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 5000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 412 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 528 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 1687 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1877 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1417 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.4 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 61 L |