2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2012 GMC Acadia
To start off, 2012 GMC Acadia is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 GMC Acadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 GMC Acadia (288 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (190 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 GMC Acadia should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 GMC Acadia weights approximately 297 kg more than 2005 Chrysler 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 GMC Acadia (366 Nm) has 108 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (258 Nm). This means 2012 GMC Acadia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2012 GMC Acadia | |
Make | Chrysler | GMC |
Model | 300 | Acadia |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 366 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 2112 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5098 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1986 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1849 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 3020 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.4 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 83 L |