2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2012 Lincoln MKZ
To start off, 2012 Lincoln MKZ is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,653 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (340 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2012 Lincoln MKZ. (263 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2012 Lincoln MKZ. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 203 kg more than 2012 Lincoln MKZ. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (529 Nm) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Lincoln MKZ. (337 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Lincoln MKZ.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2012 Lincoln MKZ | |
Make | Chrysler | Lincoln |
Model | 300 | MKZ |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5653 cc | 3500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 263 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 337 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 1632 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4821 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1834 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1445 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2728 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.4 L/100km | 8.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 66 L |