2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2012 Nissan 370Z
To start off, 2012 Nissan 370Z is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Nissan 370Z is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan 370Z (332 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 79 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan 370Z should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan 370Z weights approximately 15 kg more than 2005 Chrysler 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Nissan 370Z (366 Nm) has 34 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (332 Nm). This means 2012 Nissan 370Z will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2012 Nissan 370Z | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | 300 | 370Z |
Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3518 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 253 HP | 332 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 332 Nm | 366 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1554 kg | 1569 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4247 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1326 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 2550 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 72 L |