2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2012 SsangYong Chairman W
To start off, 2012 SsangYong Chairman W is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 3,516 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 2012 SsangYong Chairman W. (222 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2012 SsangYong Chairman W.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (340 Nm) has 44 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 SsangYong Chairman W. (296 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 SsangYong Chairman W.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chrysler 300 | 2012 SsangYong Chairman W | |
| Make | Chrysler | SsangYong |
| Model | 300 | Chairman W |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2012 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3516 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 250 HP | 222 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Torque | 340 Nm | 296 Nm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5110 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1895 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1495 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3190 mm | 2970 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
