2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2013 Aston Martin Vantage
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,935 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Aston Martin Vantage is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage (510 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 320 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (190 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 135 kg more than 2013 Aston Martin Vantage.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Aston Martin Vantage (569 Nm) has 311 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (258 Nm). This means 2013 Aston Martin Vantage will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2013 Aston Martin Vantage | |
Make | Chrysler | Aston Martin |
Model | 300 | Vantage |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 5935 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 510 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 258 Nm | 569 Nm |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 1680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4385 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2022 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1250 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 8.4 L/100km | 11.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.2 L/100km | 24.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 80 L |