2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2013 Dodge CHARGER
To start off, 2013 Dodge CHARGER is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHARGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (365 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHARGER should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHARGER weights approximately 220 kg more than 2005 Chrysler 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHARGER (536 Nm) has 196 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (340 Nm). This means 2013 Dodge CHARGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2013 Dodge CHARGER | |
Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
Model | 300 | CHARGER |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3516 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 365 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 536 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1709 kg | 1929 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5077 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1482 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3052 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 13.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 72 L |