2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2013 Dodge DART
To start off, 2013 Dodge DART is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,653 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (340 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 182 more horse power than 2013 Dodge DART. (158 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2013 Dodge DART. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 396 kg more than 2013 Dodge DART. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (529 Nm) has 332 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Dodge DART. (197 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Dodge DART.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2013 Dodge DART | |
Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
Model | 300 | DART |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5653 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 197 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 82 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 1439 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4672 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1465 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2703 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.4 L/100km | 5.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 60 L |