2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2013 Dodge DURANGO
To start off, 2013 Dodge DURANGO is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,700 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Dodge DURANGO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge DURANGO (355 HP @ 5150 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (340 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge DURANGO should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge DURANGO weights approximately 583 kg more than 2005 Chrysler 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 529 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2013 Dodge DURANGO | |
Make | Chrysler | Dodge |
Model | 300 | DURANGO |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5653 cc | 5700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 355 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5150 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 529 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 99 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 2418 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5075 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2172 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1801 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3042 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.4 L/100km | 10.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 16.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 93 L |