2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2013 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2013 GMC Sierra is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (335 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 2013 GMC Sierra. (322 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2013 GMC Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 GMC Sierra weights approximately 430 kg more than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (529 Nm) has 57 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 GMC Sierra. (472 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 GMC Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2013 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Chrysler | GMC |
Model | 300 | Sierra |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 5300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 322 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 472 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 2310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5847 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2031 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1877 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 3645 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.8 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 14.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 98 L |