2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee
To start off, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 6,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (459 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 124 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (335 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee weights approximately 456 kg more than 2005 Chrysler 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee (630 Nm) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (529 Nm). This means 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2013 Jeep Grand Cherokee | |
Make | Chrysler | Jeep |
Model | 300 | Grand Cherokee |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 6400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 335 HP | 459 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 630 Nm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1880 kg | 2336 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4859 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2156 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1756 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2916 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 9.8 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 17.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 93 L |