2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2013 Kia RIO
To start off, 2013 Kia RIO is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 3,516 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (250 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 2013 Kia RIO. (136 HP @ 6300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2013 Kia RIO. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 613 kg more than 2013 Kia RIO. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (340 Nm) has 173 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Kia RIO. (167 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Kia RIO.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2013 Kia RIO | |
Make | Chrysler | Kia |
Model | 300 | RIO |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3516 cc | 1600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 250 HP | 136 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Torque | 340 Nm | 167 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 85 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1709 kg | 1096 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4045 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1455 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3190 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 8.7 L/100km | 4.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 43 L |