2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom
To start off, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 6,700 cc (12 cylinders), 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (453 HP @ 5350 RPM) has 200 more horse power than 2005 Chrysler 300. (253 HP @ 6400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom should accelerate faster than 2005 Chrysler 300. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom weights approximately 1165 kg more than 2005 Chrysler 300. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom (720 Nm) has 388 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler 300. (332 Nm). This means 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler 300.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chrysler 300 | 2013 Rolls-Royce Phantom | |
| Make | Chrysler | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | 300 | Phantom |
| Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3518 cc | 6700 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 253 HP | 453 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5350 RPM |
| Torque | 332 Nm | 720 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 96 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 81 mm | 84 mm |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1554 kg | 2719 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 5612 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 1987 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1566 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2960 mm | 3320 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 9.8 L/100km | 10.3 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 72 L | 80 L |
