2005 Chrysler 300 vs. 2013 Volvo C30
To start off, 2013 Volvo C30 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Chrysler 300. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Chrysler 300 would be higher. At 5,653 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler 300 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler 300 (340 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 116 more horse power than 2013 Volvo C30. (224 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler 300 should accelerate faster than 2013 Volvo C30. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler 300 weights approximately 378 kg more than 2013 Volvo C30. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler 300 (529 Nm) has 209 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Volvo C30. (320 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler 300 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Volvo C30.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler 300 | 2013 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | 300 | C30 |
Year Released | 2005 | 2013 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5653 cc | 2500 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 5 valves |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 224 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 529 Nm | 320 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 100 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91 mm | 93 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1835 kg | 1457 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4266 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1890 mm | 2039 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1490 mm | 1447 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 9.4 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |