2005 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1951 Riley RM A
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Riley RM A would be higher. At 3,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 275 kg more than 1951 Riley RM A.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2005 Chrysler Crossfire | 1951 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Chrysler | Riley |
| Model | Crossfire | RM A |
| Year Released | 2005 | 1951 |
| Engine Size | 3195 cc | 1495 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 340 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1235 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2870 mm |
