2005 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1962 Lotus Elite
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (331 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 248 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 930 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Crossfire | 1962 Lotus Elite | |
Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
Model | Crossfire | Elite |
Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 1216 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 331 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 29 L |