2005 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1962 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (331 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 313 more horse power than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 1010 kg more than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (420 Nm) has 388 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Crossfire | 1962 Suzuki Fronte | |
Make | Chrysler | Suzuki |
Model | Crossfire | Fronte |
Year Released | 2005 | 1962 |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 360 cc |
Horse Power | 331 HP | 18 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 32 Nm |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1300 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2060 mm |