2005 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (331 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 315 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (420 Nm) has 222 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Crossfire | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Chrysler | Triumph |
Model | Crossfire | 2000 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 2498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 331 HP | 130 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 198 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 74.8 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 95 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2700 mm |