2005 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1973 Oldsmobile Cutlass

To start off, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 5,736 cc (8 cylinders), 1973 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (340 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1973 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (160 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1973 Oldsmobile Cutlass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1973 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 104 kg more than 2005 Chrysler Crossfire.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (420 Nm) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (380 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Oldsmobile Cutlass.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Chrysler Crossfire 1973 Oldsmobile Cutlass
Make Chrysler Oldsmobile
Model Crossfire Cutlass
Year Released 2005 1973
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3195 cc 5736 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 340 HP 160 HP
Engine RPM 6100 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 420 Nm 380 Nm
Engine Bore Size 90 mm 103.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 85.9 mm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Weight 1510 kg 1614 kg
Vehicle Length 4070 mm 5280 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1960 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1370 mm
Wheelbase Size 2410 mm 2960 mm