2005 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1973 Rover 2000

To start off, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Rover 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Rover 2000 would be higher. At 3,195 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (340 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 234 more horse power than 1973 Rover 2000. (106 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1973 Rover 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 215 kg more than 1973 Rover 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (420 Nm) has 248 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Rover 2000. (172 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Rover 2000.

Compare all specifications:

2005 Chrysler Crossfire 1973 Rover 2000
Make Chrysler Rover
Model Crossfire 2000
Year Released 2005 1973
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3195 cc 1978 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 340 HP 106 HP
Engine RPM 6100 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 420 Nm 172 Nm
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1510 kg 1295 kg
Vehicle Length 4070 mm 4550 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1690 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2410 mm 2640 mm