2005 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1973 TVR M
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 TVR M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 TVR M would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 615 kg more than 1973 TVR M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Crossfire | 1973 TVR M | |
Make | Chrysler | TVR |
Model | Crossfire | M |
Year Released | 2005 | 1973 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 331 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 895 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2290 mm |