2005 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 3,790 cc (6 cylinders), 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 88 kg more than 2005 Chrysler Crossfire.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Crossfire | 1977 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Chrysler | Oldsmobile |
Model | Crossfire | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2005 | 1977 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 3790 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1392 kg | 1480 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2760 mm |