2005 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1979 Pontiac Trans Am
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1979 Pontiac Trans Am. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1979 Pontiac Trans Am would be higher. At 6,555 cc (8 cylinders), 1979 Pontiac Trans Am is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (331 HP) has 111 more horse power than 1979 Pontiac Trans Am. (220 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1979 Pontiac Trans Am.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1979 Pontiac Trans Am (434 Nm) has 14 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler Crossfire. (420 Nm). This means 1979 Pontiac Trans Am will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler Crossfire.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Crossfire | 1979 Pontiac Trans Am | |
Make | Chrysler | Pontiac |
Model | Crossfire | Trans Am |
Year Released | 2005 | 1979 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 6555 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 331 HP | 220 HP |
Torque | 420 Nm | 434 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 104.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 95.3 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.1:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1260 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2750 mm |