2005 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1982 Nissan Cherry
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Nissan Cherry. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Nissan Cherry would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 626 kg more than 1982 Nissan Cherry.
Because 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Chrysler Crossfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Nissan Cherry, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Crossfire | 1982 Nissan Cherry | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | Crossfire | Cherry |
Year Released | 2005 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1401 kg | 775 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2400 mm |