2005 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1983 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Ford Ranger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Ford Ranger would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1983 Ford Ranger. (109 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1983 Ford Ranger.
Because 1983 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Chrysler Crossfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1983 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Crossfire | 1983 Ford Ranger | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Crossfire | Ranger |
Year Released | 2005 | 1983 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 2300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 109 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4690 mm |