2005 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1994 Ford Aerostar
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Aerostar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Aerostar would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1994 Ford Aerostar. (133 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Aerostar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Aerostar weights approximately 91 kg more than 2005 Chrysler Crossfire.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (311 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1994 Ford Aerostar. (217 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1994 Ford Aerostar.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Crossfire | 1994 Ford Aerostar | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Crossfire | Aerostar |
Year Released | 2005 | 1994 |
Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 2978 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 133 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 311 Nm | 217 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1424 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3030 mm |