2005 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1996 Oldsmobile SS
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Oldsmobile SS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Oldsmobile SS would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1996 Oldsmobile SS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (340 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 138 more horse power than 1996 Oldsmobile SS. (202 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1996 Oldsmobile SS.
Because 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Chrysler Crossfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Oldsmobile SS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (420 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Oldsmobile SS. (318 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Oldsmobile SS.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Crossfire | 1996 Oldsmobile SS | |
Make | Chrysler | Oldsmobile |
Model | Crossfire | SS |
Year Released | 2005 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3195 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 202 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 318 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5130 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1900 mm |