2005 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1997 Acura TL
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Acura TL. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Acura TL would be higher. At 3,200 cc (6 cylinders), 1997 Acura TL is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (340 HP) has 140 more horse power than 1997 Acura TL. (200 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1997 Acura TL.
Because 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Chrysler Crossfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Acura TL, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Crossfire | 1997 Acura TL | |
Make | Chrysler | Acura |
Model | Crossfire | TL |
Year Released | 2005 | 1997 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3195 cc | 3200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 200 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4864 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1786 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1405 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2840 mm |