2005 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1998 Mazda 323
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP) has 141 more horse power than 1998 Mazda 323. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1998 Mazda 323. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 277 kg more than 1998 Mazda 323. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2005 Chrysler Crossfire. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (311 Nm) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 1998 Mazda 323. (109 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1998 Mazda 323.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Crossfire | 1998 Mazda 323 | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Crossfire | 323 |
Year Released | 2005 | 1998 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 74 HP |
Torque | 311 Nm | 109 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 90 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 83.6 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.4:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1424 kg | 1147 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.8 L/100km | 8.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 55 L |