2005 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Ford Econoline. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Ford Econoline would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (340 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1999 Ford Econoline. (252 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 875 kg more than 2005 Chrysler Crossfire.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (474 Nm) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Chrysler Crossfire. (420 Nm). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Chrysler Crossfire.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Crossfire | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Crossfire | Econoline |
Year Released | 2005 | 1999 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3195 cc | 5407 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 474 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 2385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3510 mm |