2005 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 2000 GMC Sierra
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 GMC Sierra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 GMC Sierra would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 GMC Sierra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (340 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 143 more horse power than 2000 GMC Sierra. (197 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 2000 GMC Sierra. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 GMC Sierra weights approximately 265 kg more than 2005 Chrysler Crossfire.
Because 2000 GMC Sierra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2005 Chrysler Crossfire. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 GMC Sierra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (420 Nm) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 GMC Sierra. (353 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 GMC Sierra.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Crossfire | 2000 GMC Sierra | |
Make | Chrysler | GMC |
Model | Crossfire | Sierra |
Year Released | 2005 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3195 cc | 4293 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 353 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1510 kg | 1775 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3030 mm |