2005 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 2003 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Nissan X-Trail. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Nissan X-Trail would be higher. At 3,196 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. (143 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 139 kg more than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Chrysler Crossfire (311 Nm) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Nissan X-Trail. (192 Nm). This means 2005 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Nissan X-Trail.
Compare all specifications:
2005 Chrysler Crossfire | 2003 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | Crossfire | X-Trail |
Year Released | 2005 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3196 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 143 HP |
Engine RPM | 6400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 311 Nm | 192 Nm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1424 kg | 1285 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2540 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 60 L |